Skip to main content
· 1/9/1912

Southern Railway Co. v. Beam

Citations

  • 222 U.S. 444
  • 56 L. Ed. 263
  • 32 S. Ct. 145
  • 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2195

Syllabus

<p>Southern Railway Co. v. Reid, ante, p. 424, followed to effect that legislation of Congress in regard to matters of interstate commerce need not be inhibitive, but only to occupy the field, in order to supersede state statutes on the same subjeét. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Washington, ante, p. 370.</p> <p>This case is controlled by and decided on authority of Southern Railway Co. v. Reid, ante, p. 424, notwithstanding certain differences in fact.</p> <p>153 N. Car. 753, reversed.</p>

Judges: Agree, Does, McKenna, That, Therefore, Under

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.