Southern Prestige Homes, Inc. v. Moscoso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter from the plaintiffs attorney was not a rescission because the letter indicated only an attempt to rescind
• holding that the trial court erred by finding a letter indicating that “the subject of rescission was under negotiation” was a rescission of the contract
• holding that a letter stating that parties “have agreed to terminate the contract. . . cannot be said, as a matter of law, to be a unilateral recission”
• mutual rescission of a contract is a complete abrogation of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).