Southern Pine Helicopters, Inc. v. Phoenix Aviation Managers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in a case involving alleged violation of FAA regulation, that regulations or industry practices and standards “may often be relevant ..., and expert or fact testimony on what these are is often admissible.” (emphasis added)
• expert testimony on legal matters is inadmissible and intrudes on Court’s role to instruct the jury as to the law
• expert testimony on legal matters is inadmissible and intrudes on Court’s role to instruct the jury as to the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).