· 5/8/1978
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Fitzgerald
Citations
- 577 P.2d 1234
- 94 Nev. 241
- 1978 Nev. LEXIS 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that to preserve the issue for appeal, “specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument”
- explaining that to preserve the issue for appeal, \specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument\
- noting that “[t]o preserve the contention for appellate review, specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument”
- noting that a district court has broad discretion in deciding whether evidence is admissible
- noting that a district court has broad discretion in deciding whether evidence is admissible
- no clear evidence of “any bona fide offers ... or whether they related to reasonable alternative employment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunderson, Batjer, Mowbray, Thompson, Manou-Kian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.