Skip to main content
· 5/8/1978

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Fitzgerald

Citations

  • 577 P.2d 1234
  • 94 Nev. 241
  • 1978 Nev. LEXIS 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to preserve the issue for appeal, “specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument”
  • explaining that to preserve the issue for appeal, \specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument\
  • noting that “[t]o preserve the contention for appellate review, specific objections must be made to allegedly improper closing argument”
  • noting that a district court has broad discretion in deciding whether evidence is admissible
  • noting that a district court has broad discretion in deciding whether evidence is admissible
  • no clear evidence of “any bona fide offers ... or whether they related to reasonable alternative employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Batjer, Mowbray, Thompson, Manou-Kian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.