Skip to main content
· 1/6/1896

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pool

Citations

  • 160 U.S. 438
  • 16 S. Ct. 338
  • 40 L. Ed. 485
  • 1896 U.S. LEXIS 2114

Syllabus

<p>In an action against a railroad company brought by one of its employés to recover damages for injuries inflicted while on duty, where the evidence is conflicting it is the province of the. jury to pass upon the questions of negligence; but where the facts are undisputed or clearly preponderant, they are questions of law, for the court</p> <p>In this case, after a review of the undisputed facts, it is held that there can be no doubt that the injury which formed the ground for this action was the result of the inexcusable negligence of the company’s servant.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.