Skip to main content
· 6/6/1933

Southern Life & Health Ins. v. Davis

Citations

  • 25 Ala. App. 681
  • 148 So. 924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reinsurance arrangement lacked risk shifting because the parent indemnified the captive's obligation to pay an unrelated primary insurer
  • holding that a reinsurance arrangement lacked risk shifting because the parent indemnified the captive’s obligation to pay an unrelated primary insurer
  • holding that a reinsurance arrangement lacked risk shifting because the parent indemnified the captive’s obligation to pay an unrelated primary insurer
  • \National determined the premiums that it charged Kidde based in part on underwriting data supplied by Kidde's divisions and subsidiaries * * * Kidde used these same data to allocate the total premiums among its divisions and subsidiaries.\
  • “National determined the premiums that it - 44 - charged Kidde based in part on underwriting data supplied by Kidde’s divisions and subsidiaries * * * Kidde used these same data to allocate the total premiums among its divisions and subsidiaries.”
  • finding no \insurance\ where parent issued indemnification letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Samford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.