District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/21/1993
Southern Industries v. Chumney
Citations
- 613 So. 2d 74
- 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 413
- 1993 WL 8990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming award of lawn care where claimant’s medical needs included dust-free environment
- affirming award of lawn care where claimant’s medical needs included dust-free environment
- employer responsible for compensating paralyzed claimant for running board installed on specially equipped van; claimant’ s wife, who provided attendant care, “ require[d] the running board to enable her to care for claimant’ s medical needs”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Frederick Electronics v. PettijohnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07· cited 4×
- All Clear Locating Services, Inc. v. ShurrumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-13· cited 2×
- Mace v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-01-30· cited 2×
- Desir v. Nouveau AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-30
- MacE v. Tremco LibertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-01-30
- AT&T Communications and Sedgwick CMS v. Victoria Murray RossoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-02
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.