Skip to main content
· 8/11/1978

Southern California Edison Co. v. Harbor Insurance

Citations

  • 83 Cal. App. 3d 747
  • 148 Cal. Rptr. 106
  • 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the insured may seek reimbursement only for benefits inuring directly and primarily to the insurer
  • noting a sue and labor clause merely sets forth implied duties
  • when a primary benefit is conferred to the insurer mitigation expenses may be assessed against the insurer
  • difference between liability insurance and builder’s risk insurance is third-party nature, of the former

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.