Southern Brokerage Co. v. Cannarsa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ claim that bulk supplier and sophisticated user doctrines operate in tandem
• focusing on consumers’ sophistication regarding a chemical additive in their propane gas
• “It is somewhat misleading to characterize the obligation of a defendant in a strict liability context as a ‘duty to warn’ . . . . The central inquiry is whether the product placed into the stream of commerce by defendant is dangerous due to a lack of warning.”
• consumer of product was relevant user

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).