Southern Advanced Materials, LLC v. Abrams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the selection of an independent contractor to provide a service under the National Labor Relations Act did not change the fact that such service was an aspect of the relationship between the employer and employee
• noting that the Board had adhered.to its legal position despite the fact that said position had “not been accepted by reviewing courts”
• noting that the Board’s “judgment as to what is a mandatory bargaining subject is entitled to considerable deference”
• \[c]onstruing and applying the duty to bargain ... are tasks lying at the heart of the [National Labor Relations] Board's function\
• “Construing and applying the duty to bargain . . . [lies] at the heart of the Board’s function.”
• noting “Congress made a conscious decision to continue its delegation to the Board of the primary responsibility of marking out the scope of the statutory language and the statutory duty to bargain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).