Skip to main content
· 8/14/1989

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen Appeal of Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 778
  • 1989 WL 90202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the permissibility of relying on side letter agreements in interpreting collective bargaining agreements under the RLA
  • discussing the existing collective bargaining sources to be considered when agreement” and that “courts can exercise interpreting a CBA to determine whether some judicial control over the label to be a party’s position is arguably justified
  • parol evidence may be used to interpret collective agreements under the Railway Labor Act
  • parol evidence may be used to interpret collective agreements under the Railway Labor Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz, Sloviter, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.