Skip to main content
· 6/23/1981

Southeastern-Kusan, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Citations

  • 280 S.E.2d 57
  • 276 S.C. 487
  • 1981 S.C. LEXIS 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Only when the literal application of a statute produces an absurd result will [the appellate court] consider a different meaning.\
  • \Only when the literal application of a statute produces an absurd result will [the appellate court] consider a different meaning.\
  • “As a general rule, tax exemption statutes are strictly construed against the taxpayer.”
  • “The clear language [of the exemption] does not restrict or condition the exemption upon use [of the machinery] by the owner. To allow Southeastern to claim this exemption produces no absurd result____ For these reasons, Southeastern may claim the exemption.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Littlejohn, Lewis, Ness, Gregory, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.