Southeastern Freight Lines v. City of Hartsville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in dicta that “the right of contribution exists only in favor of a tortfeasor who has paid more than his pro rata share [so that in] the absence of a ripe claim for contribution, it is questionable whether joint tortfeasors are subject to Rule 14, SCRCP”
• where the Court held that the Legislature, by enacting inconsistent provisions in the Uniform Contribution Among Tort-Feasors Act, had impliedly repealed the statutory cap of the Tort Claims Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).