Skip to main content
· 2/22/1990

Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Martin (In re Martin)

Citations

  • 112 B.R. 435
  • 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we will reverse a probation revocation when the trial court considered an invalid alle- gation and might not have revoked if it had considered only the valid allegations
  • explaining that we will reverse a probation revocation when the trial court considered an invalid alle- gation and might not have revoked if it had considered only the valid allegations
  • reversing and remanding a judgment revoking probation for recon- sideration in light of other bases for revocation
  • reversing and remanding a judgment revoking probation for recon- sideration in light of other bases for revocation
  • reversing a probation revocation judgment and remanding for reconsideration when trial court erroneously found the defendant in violation of probation on an improper ground and there remained four other potentially valid bases for revocation
  • reversing a probation revocation judgment and remanding for reconsideration when trial court erroneously found the defendant in violation of probation on an improper ground and there remained four other potentially valid bases for revocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paskay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.