Skip to main content
· 7/1/1857

Southard v. Hill

Citations

  • 44 Me. 92

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the City'Clerk‘argued on appeal that the issues raised by Cook in his lawsuit were moot and that the election should not be cancelled
  • recognizing that the City Clerk argued ori appeal that the issues raised by Cook in his lawsuit were moot and that the election should not be can-celled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodenow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.