· 7/9/2009
South Texas Electric Cooperative v. Dresser-Rand Co.
Citations
- 575 F.3d 504
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15261
- 2009 WL 1961732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Texas Electric “wrote” to Dresser about the tests and that the repair work was done without “further written notice”
- stating that Texas Electric “wrote” to Dresser about the tests and that the repair work was done without “further written notice”
- “[The defendant’s] arguments [that contractual notice provisions require strict compliance] are contrary to well-established Texas law, recognizing the applicability of the doctrine of substantial compliance to contractual notice provisions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Higginbotham, Haynes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.