Skip to main content
· 7/9/2009

South Texas Electric Cooperative v. Dresser-Rand Co.

Citations

  • 575 F.3d 504
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15261
  • 2009 WL 1961732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Texas Electric “wrote” to Dresser about the tests and that the repair work was done without “further written notice”
  • stating that Texas Electric “wrote” to Dresser about the tests and that the repair work was done without “further written notice”
  • “[The defendant’s] arguments [that contractual notice provisions require strict compliance] are contrary to well-established Texas law, recognizing the applicability of the doctrine of substantial compliance to contractual notice provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Higginbotham, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.