· 12/3/2009
South Fork Band Council v. United States Department of the Interior
Citations
- 588 F.3d 718
- 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20276
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26329
- 2009 WL 4360798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issuance of an injunction pending consideration of environmental impacts under NEPA comported with the public interest
- finding that issuance of an injunction pending consideration of environmental impacts under NEPA comported with the public interest
- noting that mitigation measure must be discussed with “sufficient detail to ensure that 8 environmental consequences have been fairly evaluated” and must include “an assessment of 9 whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective”
- requiring agency to discuss effectiveness of mitigation even in the face of uncertainty
- “An essential component of a reasonably complete mitigation discussion is an assessment of whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective.”
- “An essential component of a reasonably complete mitigation discussion is an assessment of whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Tashima, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.