Skip to main content
· 12/3/2009

South Fork Band Council v. United States Department of the Interior

Citations

  • 588 F.3d 718
  • 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20276
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26329
  • 2009 WL 4360798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issuance of an injunction pending consideration of environmental impacts under NEPA comported with the public interest
  • finding that issuance of an injunction pending consideration of environmental impacts under NEPA comported with the public interest
  • noting that mitigation measure must be discussed with “sufficient detail to ensure that 8 environmental consequences have been fairly evaluated” and must include “an assessment of 9 whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective”
  • requiring agency to discuss effectiveness of mitigation even in the face of uncertainty
  • “An essential component of a reasonably complete mitigation discussion is an assessment of whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective.”
  • “An essential component of a reasonably complete mitigation discussion is an assessment of whether the proposed mitigation measures can be effective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Tashima, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.