SOUTH FLORIDA WATER v. Basore of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the destruction of crops in that case was “a consequential damage resulting from the temporary flooding and not a constitutional taking”
• holding generally, to support a claim for inverse condemnation associated with flooding, the flooding must be an actual, permanent invasion of the land, amounting to an appropriation of, and not merely an injury to, the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).