South Dakota v. McChesney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a prosecutor may “directly respond to theories of evidence offered by defense counsel”
• stating evidence the child was being used as a cover story in addition to the border agent testimony supported applying the enhancement
• “An attorney is entitled to urge the conclusions which the attorney thinks the jury should draw from the evidence. In doing so, the Government may utilize rhetorical questions that are inferential in substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).