South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. Hazeltine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that imminent loss of business as result of enforcement of contested state constitutional amendment satisfied injury-in-fact requirement of standing
• explaining that where a state constitutional amendment is motivated by a discriminatory purpose, the amendment must be stricken down as unconstitutional unless the state can demonstrate it has “no other method by which to advance [its] legitimate local interests”
• considering a wide range of evidence with respect to the issue of purpose arising out of a dormant Commerce Clause challenge to a state constitutional amendment passed by referendum that prohibited corporations owning farm land
• considering a wide range of evidence with respect to the issue of purpose arising out of a dormant Commerce Clause challenge to a state constitutional amendment passed by referendum that prohibited corporations owning farm land
• considering a wide range of evidence with respect to the issue of purpose arising out of a dormant Commerce Clause challenge to a state constitutional amendment passed by referendum that prohibited corporations owning farm land
• reviewing meeting notes and materials to determine whether a discriminatory intent existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).