South Cent. Regional Med. Center v. Guffy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “failure to provide any one of the seven categories is failure to comply” with the statute and that trial court’s failure to grant motion to dismiss if “any” of the seven categories is not included in the Notice is reversible error
• “[t]he MTCA specifically requires the plaintiff to wait ninety days 58 after providing notice before maintaining an action against a governmental entity . . . .”
• “[I]n Easterling, 928 So. 2d at 819, 2006 WL 871302 , this Court has gone further and adopted strict compliance as to the ninety-day notice requirement under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-11(1).”
• failure to comply with contents requirement of subsection (2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).