Skip to main content
· 1/7/2000

South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. State

Citations

  • 789 So. 2d 147
  • 2000 WL 10397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • articulating specific issues to be addressed on remand and contemplating further briefing and arguments of the parties
  • articulating specific issues to be addressed on remand and contemplating further briefing and arguments of the parties
  • under McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages Tobacco , 496 U.S. 18 (1990), it is not a violation of due process for a State to \bar a refund to a taxpayer that did not follow a state procedural law in seeking the refund\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.