South Carolina State Budget & Control Board v. Prince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding insurer could not deny coverage for punitive damages “in the name of the public policy when the language of its own policy specifically provides such coverage,” but failing to explain why
• “[insurance contracts are generally construed against the party who prepares them and liberally in favor of the insured.”
• noting personal injury coverage specifically insures against “intentional torts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).