· 7/19/1993
South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Great Western Coal (Kentucky) Inc.
Citations
- 437 S.E.2d 22
- 312 S.C. 559
- 1993 S.C. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “a party cannot avoid arbitration through rescission of the entire contract when there is no independent challenge to the arbitration clause”
- holding the trial court erred in ruling the appellant was not entitled to demand arbitration because he did not sign the contract in his individual capacity
- adopting a broad interpretation of Prima Paint in South Carolina, and holding that “a party cannot avoid arbitration through rescission of the entire contract when there is no independent challenge to the arbitration clause” (the Prima Paint doctrine)
- adopting a broad interpretation of Prima Paint in South Carolina, and holding that \a party cannot avoid arbitration through rescission of the entire contract when there is no independent challenge to the arbitration clause\ (the Prima Paint doctrine)
- \We hold a party cannot avoid arbitration through rescission of the entire contract when there is no independent challenge to the arbitration clause.\
- adopting the reasoning of Prima Paint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.