South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that FERC has “considerable latitude in developing a methodology responsive to its regulatory challenge” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that the reciprocity condition requires “both transmission planning and cost allocation” from “utilities that choose to seek Commission-jurisdictional transmission service”
• explaining that “section 211A plainly permits, but does not mandate, the Commission to require [an unregulated transmitting utility] to provide transmission service on given terms”
• noting that Order 1000 was based on market competition the- ory and reflected a reasoned decision that rights of first re- fusal would lead to “unjust” or “unreasonable” practices
• noting that Order 1000 was based on market competition the- ory and reflected a reasoned decision that rights of first re- fusal would lead to “unjust” or “unreasonable” practices
• noting that Order 1000 was based on market competition the- ory and reflected a reasoned decision that rights of first re- fusal would lead to “unjust” or “unreasonable” practices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).