South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Mooneyham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e interpret the pertinent language of the statutes as setting a cap on the amount which can be stacked....”
• “[W]e interpret the pertinent language of [38-77-160] as setting a cap on the amount which can be stacked ....”
• ”[T]he amount of coverage which may be stacked from policies on vehicles not involved in an accident is limited to an amount no greater than the coverage on the vehicle involved in the accident.”
• UIM statute does not allow prohibitions on stacking except in situations not relevant here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).