Skip to main content
· 2/22/2000

South Carolina Department of Revenue v. Rosemary Coin MacHines, Inc.

Citations

  • 528 S.E.2d 416
  • 339 S.C. 25
  • 2000 S.C. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \statutes that are remedial or procedural in nature are generally held to operate retrospectively\
  • noting that “statutes that are remedial or procedural in nature are generally held to operate retrospectively”
  • statute will not be given retroactive effect absent specific provision in the enactment or clear legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Finney, Toal, Burnett, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.