South Carolina Department of Mental Retardation v. Glenn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where evidence supported Committee’s decision employee had not committed misconduct, circuit court erred by reversing decision
• \Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.\
• \The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the agency's findings from being supported by substantial evidence.\
• generally accepted accounting principles do not control the determination of reasonable costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).