Skip to main content
· 7/30/2008

South Carolina Department of Disabilities & Special Needs v. Hoover Universal, Inc.

Citations

  • 535 F.3d 300
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16136
  • 2008 WL 2908930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “all of the Budget and Control Board’s members are state officials” as evidence that the State retains “ultimate veto power”
  • characterizing this factor as “whether the entity is involved with statewide, as opposed to local or other non-state concerns ”
  • considering “whether the entity is involved with statewide, as opposed to local or other non-state concerns ” (emphasis added)
  • characterizing this factor as 10 “whether the entity is involved with statewide, as opposed to local or other non-state concerns”
  • considering “whether the entity is involved with statewide, as opposed to local or other non-state concerns” (emphasis added)
  • “The line separating a State-created entity functioning independently of the State from a State-created entity functioning as an arm of the State or its alter ego is determined by the particular legal apd factual circumstances of the entity itself.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Duncan, Hilton, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.