Skip to main content
· 4/8/1971

South Carolina Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Cohen

Citations

  • 180 S.E.2d 650
  • 256 S.C. 13
  • 1971 S.C. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • scope of review for case arising on writ of certiorari is whether there is any evidence to support agency decision
  • “The statutory law does not provide for an appeal from the actions of the board. Traditionally, in this State, the actions of this board have been reviewed by the courts on a writ of certiorari.”
  • A court reviewing a case on a writ of certiorari must “confine its review to the correction of errors of law only, and will not review the findings of fact of an inferior Court or body except when such findings are wholly unsupported by the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Littlejohn, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Braelsford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.