South Burlington School District v. Calcagni-Frazier-Zajchowski Architects, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing elements of action for \negligent . . . performance of [the] obligation to exercise reasonable skill and care in the design and selection of materials\ for school roof
• discussing elements of action for “negligent . . . performance of [the] obligation to exercise reasonable skill and care in the design and selection of materials” for school roof
• stating, in a case involving property damage rather then physical injury, that “when a physical process is obscure, abstruse or so far outside common experience that lay jurors can only speculate about it expert testimony is required to explain the process”
• stating, in a case involving property damage rather than physical injury, that “when a physical process is obscure, abstruse or so far outside common experience that lay jurors can only speculate about it expert testimony is required to explain the process.”
• expert testimony not required where facts are such that layperson would know that breach of duty of care was proximate cause of injury
• party to contract has “implied duty to perform with care, skill, reasonable expedience and faithfulness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).