Skip to main content
· 8/29/2003

South Abington Township v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 175
  • 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the concept of “recurrence” under a claim for workers’ compensation benefits provided under a primary workers’ compensation insurance policy
  • discussing the nature of and dissimilarities between an “aggravation” and a “recurrence” of an injury in situations where a claimant has worked for different employers (or one employer had different insurance carriers) and sustained two work- related injuries
  • the current employer, rather than the previous employer, is liable for workers' compensation benefits arising from an aggravation or new injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith-Ribner, Leadbetter, Jiuliante

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.