Sousa v. Chaset

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “plaintiff’s urological condition, and the treatment he received or should have received for the same, were matters beyond the obvious common knowledge of the jury”
• “plaintiffs urological condition, and the treatment he received or should have received for the same, were matters beyond the obvious common knowledge of the jury”
• “An expert who has not been engaged, but only subpoenaed, cannot be compelled to give opinion testimony against his or her will.”
• “An expert who has not been engaged, but only subpoenaed, cannot be compelled to give opinion testimony against his or her will.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).