Soul v. Keller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court properly denied a motion to amend to assert crossclaims against defendants that had already been dismissed from the case
• finding that the district court properly denied a motion to amend to assert crossclaims against defendants that had already been dismissed from the case
• explaining that sovereign immunity is a “jurisdictional issue”
• \a question of whether an FTCA claim is barred by Feres is necessarily one of jurisdiction\
• “Also relevant is whether the activity is limited to military personnel and whether the service member was taking advantage of a privilege or enjoying a benefit conferred as a result of military service.”
• “Also relevant is whether the activity is limited to military personnel and whether the service member was taking advantage of a privilege or enjoying a benefit conferred as a result of military service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).