· 12/13/1982
Soto v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Citations
- 459 U.S. 1090
- 103 S. Ct. 576
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3460
- 74 L. Ed. 2d 937
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Not every communication between an attorney and client is privileged, only confidential communications which involve the requesting or giving of legal advice”
- “The subject matter of meetings with an attorney, the persons present, the location of the meetings, or the persons arranging the.meetings are not protected by the privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.