Soto v. STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Puerto Rico's Law 80 requires that an employer pay severance pay to every employee who is \discharged . . . without just cause\
• noting that any New Mexico law requiring mutuality of obligation within an arbitration clause “would be preempted by the FAA”
• applying Puerto Rico law and listing cases to the same effect in Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Illinois, and South Carolina
• rejecting argument that district court improperly considered documents outside scope of complaint because movant sought review under FAA as opposed to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
• “[A]n arbitration agreement is not made unenforceable . . . merely because signing it was a condition of continued employment.”
• “[A]n arbitration agreement is not made unenforceable . . . merely because signing it was a condition of continued employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).