Soto v. Lord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although “ ‘technical rules of evidence do not apply in prison disciplinary proceedings’ [citations omitted], nevertheless ‘the basic integrity of the system’ must be insured”
• “When money damages are sought plaintiff must show that the chain of custody form is so untrustworthy that its use violated the due process clause.”
• “A denial of a motion to dismiss establishes only that the 17 claims are plausible; it does not establish the merits of the claim.”
• “Nowhere in Plaintiff’s complaint does he specifically state 15 what religious beliefs he holds or why his religious beliefs conflict with [Defendant’s] vaccine 16 requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).