Skip to main content
· 6/25/2009

Soto v. Fischer

Citations

  • 12 N.Y.3d 900
  • 912 N.E.2d 1061
  • 884 N.Y.S.2d 681
  • 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 2535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that piercing the corporate veil was inappropriate when the plaintiff failed to show that the statements made were assurances of personal liability
  • holding that piercing the corporate veil was inappropriate when the plaintiff failed to show that the statements made were assurances of personal liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.