Soto v. City of Newark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against City of Newark because public entities may not be held liable for intentional torts of its employees
• finding a city could not be liable for employee’s intentional infliction of emotional distress
• court violated the ADA by refusing three requests by profoundly deaf plaintiffs to provide a qualified sign language interpreter at their wedding ceremony in a courthouse, which plaintiffs could not understand
• “[T]he Court cannot find Defendants – public entities – liable for [IIED].”
• “[T]he Court cannot find Defendants – public entities – liable for [IIED].”
• “[T]he Court cannot find Defendants – public entities – liable for [IIED].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).