· 3/1/2005
Soto v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Citations
- 611 S.E.2d 108
- 271 Ga. App. 813
- 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 479
- 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 687
- 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact that buyer drove car for 25,000 miles “negates his claim that the vehicle was unmerchantable at the time of purchase, since it clearly was capable of being driven”
- fact that buyer drove car for 25,000 miles “negates his claim that the vehicle was unmerchantable at the time of purchase, since it clearly was capable of being driven”
- “Applying the relevant provisions of OCGA § 11-2-314 (2) (b
- “Applying the relevant provisions of OCGA § 11-2-314 (2) (b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Johnson, Phipps
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.