Soto v. Apple Towing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to remand in a discrimination action where the statutes at issue were not stated in the complaint, and where plaintiff’s counsel declined to clarify the claims upon defense counsel’s informal request
• “[T]here is no requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) that a defendant exer- cise a duty to investigate, and this Court will not read into the statute such a condition. To do so would invite wasteful litigation as parties spar over the issues of diligence and ascertainability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).