· 10/29/2002
Soto-Ramirez v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 228 F. Supp. 2d 566
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20647
- 2002 WL 31420763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that indefinite detention did not violate the Due Process Clause, where appropriate provisions for parole had been followed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.