Soto-Padró v. Public Buildings Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 59(e) cannot be used “to rehash arguments previously rejected”
• “‘if the lawful reason alone would have sufficed to justify the [action],’ ‘[t]hen the employee cannot prevail.[‘]”
• “[A] party cannot use a Rule 59(e) motion to rehash arguments previously rejected or to raise ones that ‘could, and should, have been made before judgment issued.’” (quoting Vega v. Cruz-Burgos, 537 F.3d 14, 22 (1st Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).