Soto-Ocasio v. Federal Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff “must produce evidence in addition to 15 that which was sufficient for her prima facie case in order to rebut the defendant’s showing” 16 of non-discriminatory purpose
• “Settlement is the offspring of compromise; the question we address is 19 not whether the final product could be prettier, smarter or snazzier, but whether it is fair, adequate 20 and free from collusion.”
• “The party seeking to avoid summary judgment ‘must be able to point to specific, competent evidence to support his claim, mere allegations, or conjecture unsupported in the record, are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The party seeking to avoid summary judgment ‘must be able to point to specific, competent evidence to support his claim, mere allegations, or conjecture unsupported in the record, are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).