Soto-Fonalledas v. Ritz-Carlton San Juan Hotel Spa & Casino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff “is bound” by precedent allowing Title VII claims to be submitted to arbitration without “violating congressional intent”
• holding that the exchange of promises contained in the Ritz-Carlton employee agreement is sufficient mutual consideration, and the plaintiff did not “deny that she received the agreement or that she signed for it.”
• indicating that “principles of state contract law control the determination of whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists”
• holding that discrimination claims are arbitrable as disputes arising from a contract
• indicating that \principles of state contract law control the determination of whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists\
• affirming the district court’s granting of a motion to compel arbitration and dismissing on the grounds that the dispute was covered by an arbitration agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).