Sotack v. Gnaden Huetten Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the IDEA’s exhaustion requirement is not a jurisdictional requirement but a claims-processing rule”
• dismissing IDEA claim for failure to exhaust administrative requirements because, in part, appellants “have not raised any equitable arguments”
• stressing the need to exercise “caution[] . . . about the overuse of the term ‘jurisdiction,’” including in the IDEA context
• dismissing an IDEA claim for failure to exhaust administrative requirements because, in part, appellants “have not raised any equitable arguments that apply here”
• explaining that IDEA’s exhaustion requirement is no longer jurisdictional
• “The text of the IDEA does not signal a clear congressional intent to limit the jurisdiction of the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).