Sostenes Rivas, Jr. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment
• holding that \the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is likewise a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment\
• holding that \the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is likewise a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.\
• holding that the confrontation clause is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment
• concluding that the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against the accused is a fundamental right
• holding that the right of an accused to confront witnesses against him is a fundamental right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).