Sossenko v. Michelin Tire Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that harassment was not outrageous behavior
• warnings, job transfers, and harassment directed toward “whistleblower” do not state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• warnings, job transfers, and harassment directed towards \whistleblower\ do not constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress
• warnings, job transfers, and harassment directed towards “whistleblower” do not constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress
• affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant where claim was based on incidents involving threats to plaintiffs life and future employment'with defendant made by plaintiffs supervisors
• advice and warnings to employee do not rise to requisite level of outrageousness to support claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).