Sosa v. Central Power & Light

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding amended petition was timely filed on the sixth, rather than seventh, day before the date of the hearing under TEX.R. CIV. P. 4 and overruling contrary authority
• holding amended petition was timely filed on the sixth, rather than seventh, day before the date of the hearing under Tex.R. Civ. P. 4 and overruling contrary authority
• explaining that in computing relevant time frame, day of amended pleading’s filing is not counted but date of trial is
• holding second amended petition timely filed “exactly one week before a scheduled summary judgment hearing”
• interpreting rule 63 affording the right to amend without leave when filed exactly one week before summary judgment hearing
• applying the seven-day time constraint of rule 63 to the time period preceding a summary judgment hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).