Sorrow v. Vickery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In challenging the termination of her matriculation, along with allegations based on contract, tort[,] and racial discrimination, the pro se plaintiff should have brought a proceeding under CPLR article 78, rather than this plenary action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).